Criminal Law and Criminology
Ismail Qamari; Hoda Ghamari
Abstract
The principle of universal jurisdiction is a powerful tool in the service of international criminal justice. The principle of universal jurisdiction, under which states have the right and sometimes the obligation to prosecute and punish perpetrators of international crimes regardless of the place of ...
Read More
The principle of universal jurisdiction is a powerful tool in the service of international criminal justice. The principle of universal jurisdiction, under which states have the right and sometimes the obligation to prosecute and punish perpetrators of international crimes regardless of the place of commission, nationality of the perpetrators and their victims, has undergone a profound transformation in various dimensions. With the emergence of transnational crimes, the need for revision on the basis of territorial and personal jurisdiction has emerged. The concept of the principle of universal criminal jurisdiction, according to which the national courts of a country can prosecute a crime that has not occurred within the territory of that country, is not the subject of an accused or a defendant, and has not committed a crime against the interests of that country, has evolved in different dimensions. Crimes such as slavery and slave trade, piracy, racism, hostage-taking and air raids have been among the universal jurisdictional norms referred to in the article of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Criminal Law and Criminology
Ismail Qamari; Nahid Moradizadeh
Abstract
Among the obligations of Islamic religion and Sharia, Hijab has become a mandatory law for females with diverse beliefs in our society besides its religious facet. In criminal law, freedom is different based on adopted criminal policy by each state relevant to delinquency. Based on Article 4 of the Constitution, ...
Read More
Among the obligations of Islamic religion and Sharia, Hijab has become a mandatory law for females with diverse beliefs in our society besides its religious facet. In criminal law, freedom is different based on adopted criminal policy by each state relevant to delinquency. Based on Article 4 of the Constitution, the general policy of Iran's legal and social context must rely on Islamic codes; the legislator has placed Sharia wearing under legal (criminal) protection. The presuppositions based on state social responsibilities to protect structural values, their observance, and preserve social ethics as macro-principles, and belief in hijab preventive side of victimization in some crimes, awareness, and security provision in females as a psychological basis in wisdom foundations, prompted the legislator to link female hijab with criminal law. Through descriptive and analytical analysis, this article examined legal principles of criminal intervention for hijab through verses, traditions, and legal sources. Based on the results, hijab sharia ruling has a social entity examined by legal requirements. The essential basis for hijab in administrative law is recruitment regulations and relevant conditions, while non-hijab is a violation resulting in discretionary correction. Having no hijab is not inherently criminal in civil rights (under other criminal titles), and its criminal examination is incorrect with religious, political, and social outcomes. Accordingly, legal and judicial system of Islamic Republic of Iran should observe non-hijab as a social harm
Criminal Law and Criminology
Ismail Qamari; Hoda Ghamari
Abstract
The principle of universal jurisdiction of criminal laws is one of the most important principles in determining the jurisdiction of countries and criminal laws. According to this principle, any country can, without any traditional relationship with the crime of preventing the citizenship of the criminal ...
Read More
The principle of universal jurisdiction of criminal laws is one of the most important principles in determining the jurisdiction of countries and criminal laws. According to this principle, any country can, without any traditional relationship with the crime of preventing the citizenship of the criminal or the defendant against the place of the crime or the interests of the country, be harmed, in order to keep the criminal unpunished, pursue and punish him. Although most countries in the world today have not recognized this principle, but very few of them have actually taken action to implement it, and this is important due to international conventions and treaties that in the event of a crime, despite the fact that the perpetrator is not a citizen of that country's "territorial jurisdiction" or "personal jurisdiction" or that the crimes are not represented by the criminal laws of the country of detention
